📋 Files Schedule-A mass-defendant suits

Trias Holding AG

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 2018–2026

Yes. Trias Holding AG has filed federal trademark enforcement actions naming online sellers as defendants. On record (2018–2026): 8 federal "Schedule A" trademark infringement (and frequently counterfeiting) lawsuits in which online sellers are named under a sealed defendant exhibit — these proceedings, predominantly filed in the Northern District of Illinois, typically seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d) that direct marketplaces and payment processors to restrain the listed defendants' accounts; 8 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 14 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 100% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Before you list

Selling anything that might resemble their marks?

Check your design against Trias Holding AG's registered marks — and 13M+ others — before you list.

Check your design free

Free trial · no card · 3 checks that never expire

Federal court filings

8
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
8
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
0
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

Schedule-A cases list defendants under a sealed exhibit and commonly seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d). When granted, the court order directs marketplaces (Etsy, Amazon, eBay) and payment processors (PayPal, Stripe) to restrain the listed defendants’ accounts pending the proceeding.

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

13
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
1
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
11
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
0
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
2
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 100% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Designs Trias Holding AG has opposed

Real trademark applications Trias Holding AG challenged at the USPTO — the kind of design that draws an opposition. If your artwork looks like one of these, expect pushback. Each links to its USPTO docket.

Source: USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board records. “Prevailed” means Trias Holding AG got the outcome it sought; settled/withdrawn cases ended without a Board ruling on the merits. Images from public USPTO records.

Marks Trias Holding AG has asserted in proceedings

MCM
MCM
asserted in 9 proceedings
MCM
MCM
asserted in 9 proceedings
MCM
MCM
asserted in 8 proceedings
MCM
MCM
asserted in 8 proceedings
MCM
MCM
asserted in 7 proceedings
MCM MÜNCHEN
MCM MÜNCHEN
asserted in 5 proceedings
MCM
MCM
asserted in 4 proceedings
MCM
MCM
asserted in 4 proceedings
MarkSerialProceedings
MCMtext8897761312
MCMtext7916953312
MCM889776149
MCM731017229
MCM791455508
MCM735350718
MCM745472087
MCM 1976text792727255
MCM MÜNCHEN882369165
MCMtext792552884
MCM792727234
MCM745472074
MCM745470073
MCM736608223
MCM745470083
MCM745470103
MCM852586623
MCMtext737465453
MCMtext793722252
MCM864238282
MCMtext865371942
MCM869796582
MCMtext869796572
MCM791645312
MCM866670582
MCMtext866670872
MCM ANNAtext793214301
MCM TRACYtext793214241
MCM TONItext793214261
MCMtext882358161
MCM HERITAGEtext793214291
MCM869827221
MCM882369481
MCM COLLECTION870193441
MCMtext879757761
MCM ESSENTIALtext793214281
MCM MILLIEtext793214211

From public USPTO records. A mark is listed when it appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file. Serial links open the USPTO TSDR record.

Selling a design that may resemble Trias Holding AG’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Trias Holding AG’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Trias Holding AG. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.