📋 Files Schedule-A mass-defendant suits

Sugartown Worldwide, Inc.

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 2001–2021

Yes. Sugartown Worldwide, Inc. has filed federal trademark enforcement actions naming online sellers as defendants. On record (2001–2021): 7 federal "Schedule A" trademark infringement (and frequently counterfeiting) lawsuits in which online sellers are named under a sealed defendant exhibit — these proceedings, predominantly filed in the Northern District of Illinois, typically seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d) that direct marketplaces and payment processors to restrain the listed defendants' accounts; 17 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 9 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 100% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Before you list

Selling anything that might resemble their marks?

Check your design against Sugartown Worldwide, Inc.'s registered marks — and 13M+ others — before you list.

Check your design free

Free trial · no card · 3 checks that never expire

Federal court filings

7
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
8
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
9
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

Schedule-A cases list defendants under a sealed exhibit and commonly seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d). When granted, the court order directs marketplaces (Etsy, Amazon, eBay) and payment processors (PayPal, Stripe) to restrain the listed defendants’ accounts pending the proceeding.

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

8
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
1
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
5
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
0
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
4
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 100% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Designs Sugartown Worldwide, Inc. has opposed

Real trademark applications Sugartown Worldwide, Inc. challenged at the USPTO — the kind of design that draws an opposition. If your artwork looks like one of these, expect pushback. Each links to its USPTO docket.

Source: USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board records. “Prevailed” means Sugartown Worldwide, Inc. got the outcome it sought; settled/withdrawn cases ended without a Board ruling on the merits. Images from public USPTO records.

Marks Sugartown Worldwide, Inc. has asserted in proceedings

LILLY PULITZER
LILLY PULITZER
asserted in 5 proceedings
LILLY PULITZER
LILLY PULITZER
asserted in 2 proceedings
LILLY
LILLY
asserted in 2 proceedings
LILLY PULITZER
LILLY PULITZER
asserted in 1 proceedings
LILLY PULITZER
LILLY PULITZER
asserted in 1 proceedings
L
L
asserted in 1 proceedings
LILLY PULITZER
LILLY PULITZER
asserted in 1 proceedings
MarkSerialProceedings
LILLY PULITZER744282755
LILLY PULITZERtext731711343
LILLY PULITZERtext748026173
LILLY PULITZERtext745520033
LILLY PULITZERtext751006833
LILLY PULITZER771415932
LILLY PULITZERtext785160162
LILLY855988652
LITTLE LILLYtext854097552
XX LILLYtext776603852
LILLY PULITZER784163621
LILLY PULITZERtext770158661
LILLY PULITZERtext754349901
LILLY PULITZERtext756281751
LILLY PULITZERtext781248271
LILLY PULITZER785160521
L789803571
LILLY PULITZERtext786752401
THE LILLY PULITZER REVIVALtext787462431
LILLY PULITZERtext784269431
LILLY PULITZER742336471

From public USPTO records. A mark is listed when it appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file. Serial links open the USPTO TSDR record.

Selling a design that may resemble Sugartown Worldwide, Inc.’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Sugartown Worldwide, Inc.’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Sugartown Worldwide, Inc.. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.