📋 Files Schedule-A mass-defendant suits

Roadget Business Pte, Ltd.

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 2022–2026

Yes. Roadget Business Pte, Ltd. has filed federal trademark enforcement actions naming online sellers as defendants. On record (2022–2026): 13 federal "Schedule A" trademark infringement (and frequently counterfeiting) lawsuits in which online sellers are named under a sealed defendant exhibit — these proceedings, predominantly filed in the Northern District of Illinois, typically seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d) that direct marketplaces and payment processors to restrain the listed defendants' accounts; 25 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 9 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 100% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Before you list

Selling anything that might resemble their marks?

Check your design against Roadget Business Pte, Ltd.'s registered marks — and 13M+ others — before you list.

Check your design free

Free trial · no card · 3 checks that never expire

Federal court filings

13
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
1
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
24
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

Schedule-A cases list defendants under a sealed exhibit and commonly seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d). When granted, the court order directs marketplaces (Etsy, Amazon, eBay) and payment processors (PayPal, Stripe) to restrain the listed defendants’ accounts pending the proceeding.

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

5
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
4
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
8
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
0
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
0
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 100% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Designs Roadget Business Pte, Ltd. has opposed

Real trademark applications Roadget Business Pte, Ltd. challenged at the USPTO — the kind of design that draws an opposition. If your artwork looks like one of these, expect pushback. Each links to its USPTO docket.

Source: USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board records. “Prevailed” means Roadget Business Pte, Ltd. got the outcome it sought; settled/withdrawn cases ended without a Board ruling on the merits. Images from public USPTO records.

Marks Roadget Business Pte, Ltd. has asserted in proceedings

SHEIN
SHEIN
asserted in 5 proceedings
SHEIN
SHEIN
asserted in 5 proceedings
SHEIN
SHEIN
asserted in 5 proceedings
SHEIN
SHEIN
asserted in 5 proceedings
SHEIN
SHEIN
asserted in 5 proceedings
SHEIN
SHEIN
asserted in 5 proceedings
SHEIN
SHEIN
asserted in 5 proceedings
SHEIN
SHEIN
asserted in 5 proceedings
MarkSerialProceedings
SHEINtext881075635
SHEINtext881075715
SHEIN878572415
SHEIN887766665
SHEIN878571835
SHEIN878571475
SHEIN865265885
SHEIN878572225
SHEIN878572495
SHEIN878571885
SHEIN878572255
SHEINMANtext881077312
GLAMRAE988758212
SHEIN X971527762
SHEIN878572582
SHEIN SXYtext972319472
SHEIN878572472
SHEIN CURVEtext888096992
SHEIN PREMIUMtext888476812
SHEINKIDStext881075742
RE_STYLDtext905898381
PETSINtext907127781
PETSINtext907127991
PETSINtext907127921
PETSINtext907127651

From public USPTO records. A mark is listed when it appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file. Serial links open the USPTO TSDR record.

Selling a design that may resemble Roadget Business Pte, Ltd.’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Roadget Business Pte, Ltd.’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Roadget Business Pte, Ltd.. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.