📋 Files Schedule-A mass-defendant suits

PRL USA Holdings, Inc.

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 1997–2026

Yes. PRL USA Holdings, Inc. has filed federal trademark enforcement actions naming online sellers as defendants. On record (1997–2026): 11 federal "Schedule A" trademark infringement (and frequently counterfeiting) lawsuits in which online sellers are named under a sealed defendant exhibit — these proceedings, predominantly filed in the Northern District of Illinois, typically seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d) that direct marketplaces and payment processors to restrain the listed defendants' accounts; 68 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 183 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 92% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Federal court filings

11
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
68
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
0
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

Schedule-A cases list defendants under a sealed exhibit and commonly seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d). When granted, the court order directs marketplaces (Etsy, Amazon, eBay) and payment processors (PayPal, Stripe) to restrain the listed defendants’ accounts pending the proceeding.

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

161
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
22
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
134
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
12
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
32
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 92% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Marks PRL USA Holdings, Inc. has asserted in proceedings

POLO RALPH LAUREN
POLO RALPH LAUREN
asserted in 75 proceedings
POLO BY RALPH LAUREN
POLO BY RALPH LAUREN
asserted in 73 proceedings
POLO BY RALPH LAUREN
POLO BY RALPH LAUREN
asserted in 52 proceedings
POLO RALPH LAUREN
POLO RALPH LAUREN
asserted in 52 proceedings
POLO RALPH LAUREN
POLO RALPH LAUREN
asserted in 46 proceedings
trademark
asserted in 41 proceedings

Mark images shown from public USPTO records. Listing here reflects that the mark appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file.

Selling a design that may resemble PRL USA Holdings, Inc.’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against PRL USA Holdings, Inc.’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by PRL USA Holdings, Inc.. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.