LogoVerifyLogoVerify
🏛 Files TTAB oppositions or cancellation petitions

Pittsburgh Associates

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 1990–2026

Pittsburgh Associates has filed enforcement proceedings at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. On record (1990–2026): 74 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 76% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

74
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
0
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
31
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
10
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
33
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 76% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Marks Pittsburgh Associates has asserted in proceedings

PIRATES
PIRATES
asserted in 34 proceedings
PIRATES
PIRATES
asserted in 31 proceedings
PITTSBURGH PIRATES
PITTSBURGH PIRATES
asserted in 25 proceedings
PIRATES 1887 1987
PIRATES 1887 1987
asserted in 24 proceedings
PIRATES
PIRATES
asserted in 24 proceedings
PIRATES
PIRATES
asserted in 24 proceedings
PIRATES
PIRATES
asserted in 24 proceedings
PIRATES
PIRATES
asserted in 24 proceedings

Mark images shown from public USPTO records. Listing here reflects that the mark appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file.

Selling a design that may resemble Pittsburgh Associates’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Pittsburgh Associates’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Pittsburgh Associates. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.