📋 Files Schedule-A mass-defendant suits

Montblanc-Simplo GmbH

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 1987–2025

Yes. Montblanc-Simplo GmbH has filed federal trademark enforcement actions naming online sellers as defendants. On record (1987–2025): 1 federal "Schedule A" trademark infringement (and frequently counterfeiting) lawsuits in which online sellers are named under a sealed defendant exhibit — these proceedings, predominantly filed in the Northern District of Illinois, typically seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d) that direct marketplaces and payment processors to restrain the listed defendants' accounts; 46 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 24 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 80% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Before you list

Selling anything that might resemble their marks?

Check your design against Montblanc-Simplo GmbH's registered marks — and 13M+ others — before you list.

Check your design free

Free trial · no card · 3 checks that never expire

Federal court filings

1
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
42
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
4
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

Schedule-A cases list defendants under a sealed exhibit and commonly seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d). When granted, the court order directs marketplaces (Etsy, Amazon, eBay) and payment processors (PayPal, Stripe) to restrain the listed defendants’ accounts pending the proceeding.

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

18
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
6
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
16
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
4
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
4
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 80% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Designs Montblanc-Simplo GmbH has opposed

Real trademark applications Montblanc-Simplo GmbH challenged at the USPTO — the kind of design that draws an opposition. If your artwork looks like one of these, expect pushback. Each links to its USPTO docket.

Source: USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board records. “Prevailed” means Montblanc-Simplo GmbH got the outcome it sought; settled/withdrawn cases ended without a Board ruling on the merits. Images from public USPTO records.

Marks Montblanc-Simplo GmbH has asserted in proceedings

MONT BLANC
MONT BLANC
asserted in 2 proceedings
MONT BLANC
MONT BLANC
asserted in 2 proceedings
trademark
asserted in 2 proceedings
MEISTERSTUCK
MEISTERSTUCK
asserted in 2 proceedings
BOHEME
BOHEME
asserted in 1 proceedings
MONTBLANC
MONTBLANC
asserted in 1 proceedings
MarkSerialProceedings
MONTBLANCtext721836169
MONTBLANCtext751680305
MONTBLANCtext744810095
MONTBLANCtext743718785
MONTBLANCtext756652645
MONT BLANC791386322
MONT BLANC763542442
(design-only mark)722682682
MONTBLANCtext792157762
MEISTERSTUCK751803802
BOHEME762485961
PIXtext791585611
STARWALKERtext781817341
SOLITAIREtext734795411
BOHEMEtext863218781
MONTBLANC799753231
VASCO DA GAMAtext791882171

From public USPTO records. A mark is listed when it appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file. Serial links open the USPTO TSDR record.

Selling a design that may resemble Montblanc-Simplo GmbH’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Montblanc-Simplo GmbH’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Montblanc-Simplo GmbH. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.