LogoVerifyLogoVerify
🏛 Files TTAB oppositions or cancellation petitions

Lyft Inc.

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 2014–2026

Lyft Inc. has filed enforcement proceedings at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. On record (2014–2026): 49 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 84% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

47
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
2
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
27
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
5
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
14
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 84% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Marks Lyft Inc. has asserted in proceedings

LYFT
LYFT
asserted in 47 proceedings
LYFT
LYFT
asserted in 45 proceedings
LYFT PINK
LYFT PINK
asserted in 31 proceedings
LYFT
LYFT
asserted in 30 proceedings

Mark images shown from public USPTO records. Listing here reflects that the mark appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file.

Selling a design that may resemble Lyft Inc.’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Lyft Inc.’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Lyft Inc.. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.