Levi Strauss & Co.
Trademark enforcement profile · on record 1975–2026
Yes. Levi Strauss & Co. has filed federal trademark enforcement actions naming online sellers as defendants. On record (1975–2026): 41 federal "Schedule A" trademark infringement (and frequently counterfeiting) lawsuits in which online sellers are named under a sealed defendant exhibit — these proceedings, predominantly filed in the Northern District of Illinois, typically seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d) that direct marketplaces and payment processors to restrain the listed defendants' accounts; 350 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 237 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 86% of merits decisions).
Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.
Federal court filings
Schedule-A cases list defendants under a sealed exhibit and commonly seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d). When granted, the court order directs marketplaces (Etsy, Amazon, eBay) and payment processors (PayPal, Stripe) to restrain the listed defendants’ accounts pending the proceeding.
At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)
Prevailed in 86% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).
Marks Levi Strauss & Co. has asserted in proceedings
Mark images shown from public USPTO records. Listing here reflects that the mark appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file.
Selling a design that may resemble Levi Strauss & Co.’s registered marks?
Run a visual similarity check against Levi Strauss & Co.’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.
Run a free visual checkFAQ
Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Levi Strauss & Co.. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.