LogoVerifyLogoVerify
📋 Files Schedule-A mass-defendant suits

International Watchman, Inc.

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 2013–2024

Yes. International Watchman, Inc. has filed federal trademark enforcement actions naming online sellers as defendants. On record (2013–2024): 2 federal "Schedule A" trademark infringement (and frequently counterfeiting) lawsuits in which online sellers are named under a sealed defendant exhibit — these proceedings, predominantly filed in the Northern District of Illinois, typically seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d) that direct marketplaces and payment processors to restrain the listed defendants' accounts; 17 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 3 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 100% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Before you list

Selling anything that might resemble their marks?

Check your design against International Watchman, Inc.'s registered marks — and 13M+ others — before you list.

Check your design free

Free trial · no card · 3 checks that never expire

Federal court filings

2
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
17
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
0
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

Schedule-A cases list defendants under a sealed exhibit and commonly seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d). When granted, the court order directs marketplaces (Etsy, Amazon, eBay) and payment processors (PayPal, Stripe) to restrain the listed defendants’ accounts pending the proceeding.

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

3
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
0
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
3
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
0
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
0
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 100% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Marks International Watchman, Inc. has asserted in proceedings

MarkSerialProceedings
NATOtext874181533
NATOtext874181563
NATOtext853573662
NATOtext857861582
NATOtext850548292
NATOtext864533092
NATOtext855867772
NATOtext867192312
NATOtext873028912
NATOtext873029072
NATOtext873028922
NATOtext864557042
NATOtext855478151
NATOtext865949161
G-10text865600581
NATOtext866216001
NATOtext866215941
NATOtext866215831
NATOtext857861491
AMMOtext865391131
AMMOtext879427811
AMMOtext889752731
AMMOtext883091161
N8Otext881906551

From public USPTO records. A mark is listed when it appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file. Serial links open the USPTO TSDR record.

Selling a design that may resemble International Watchman, Inc.’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against International Watchman, Inc.’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by International Watchman, Inc.. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.