LogoVerifyLogoVerify
🏛 Files TTAB oppositions or cancellation petitions

Gilmar S.p.A.

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 1988–2021

Gilmar S.p.A. has filed enforcement proceedings at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. On record (1988–2021): 96 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 73% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

91
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
5
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
63
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
23
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
10
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 73% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Marks Gilmar S.p.A. has asserted in proceedings

HISTORY ICEBERG
HISTORY ICEBERG
asserted in 39 proceedings
ICE B ICEBERG
ICE B ICEBERG
asserted in 38 proceedings
ICEBERG JEANS
ICEBERG JEANS
asserted in 38 proceedings
ICEBERG SPORT ICE
ICEBERG SPORT ICE
asserted in 38 proceedings
SPORT ICE
SPORT ICE
asserted in 37 proceedings
AISBERG
AISBERG
asserted in 27 proceedings
IJ ICEBERG JEANS
IJ ICEBERG JEANS
asserted in 27 proceedings
ICE ICEBERG
ICE ICEBERG
asserted in 3 proceedings

Mark images shown from public USPTO records. Listing here reflects that the mark appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file.

Selling a design that may resemble Gilmar S.p.A.’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Gilmar S.p.A.’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Gilmar S.p.A.. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.