🏛 Files TTAB oppositions or cancellation petitions

Gap (Apparel), LLC

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 2000–2026

Gap (Apparel), LLC has filed enforcement proceedings at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. On record (2000–2026): 206 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 95% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

197
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
9
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
159
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
8
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
30
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 95% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Marks Gap (Apparel), LLC has asserted in proceedings

GAP
GAP
asserted in 166 proceedings
THE GAP
THE GAP
asserted in 150 proceedings
GAP KIDS
GAP KIDS
asserted in 150 proceedings

Mark images shown from public USPTO records. Listing here reflects that the mark appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file.

Selling a design that may resemble Gap (Apparel), LLC’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Gap (Apparel), LLC’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Gap (Apparel), LLC. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.