⚖️ Files federal trademark or copyright suits

EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 1988–2026

EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION has filed federal trademark or copyright enforcement actions. On record (1988–2026): 9 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 33 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 71% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Before you list

Selling anything that might resemble their marks?

Check your design against EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION's registered marks — and 13M+ others — before you list.

Check your design free

Free trial · no card · 3 checks that never expire

Federal court filings

0
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
8
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
1
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

30
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
3
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
12
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
5
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
16
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 71% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Designs EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION has opposed

Real trademark applications EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION challenged at the USPTO — the kind of design that draws an opposition. If your artwork looks like one of these, expect pushback. Each links to its USPTO docket.

Source: USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board records. “Prevailed” means EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION got the outcome it sought; settled/withdrawn cases ended without a Board ruling on the merits. Images from public USPTO records.

Marks EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION has asserted in proceedings

EPIC
EPIC
asserted in 2 proceedings
EPIC
EPIC
asserted in 1 proceedings
MarkSerialProceedings
EPICtext742992528
EPICCAREtext744898957
EPICENTERtext751697076
EPICWEBtext754606846
ANALYSTtext737018136
ASAPtext738397046
EPICLINKtext753434255
EPICtext855580503
EPICONHANDtext762990923
BREEZEtext737503492
EPIC857939542
EPIC EARTHtext857641042
LEGACYtext738394302
EPIC853458551
EPIC RESEARCHtext973408341
CHRONICLEStext737229621
WISDOMtext859512361
EPICSHAREtext908937051
OPTIMEtext737504741
CARE EVERYWHEREtext784178891
HYPERSPACEtext763515391
LEGACYtext740443381
KITtext873405841

From public USPTO records. A mark is listed when it appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file. Serial links open the USPTO TSDR record.

Selling a design that may resemble EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.