📋 Files Schedule-A mass-defendant suits

Duke University

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 1985–2026

Yes. Duke University has filed federal trademark enforcement actions naming online sellers as defendants. On record (1985–2026): 2 federal "Schedule A" trademark infringement (and frequently counterfeiting) lawsuits in which online sellers are named under a sealed defendant exhibit — these proceedings, predominantly filed in the Northern District of Illinois, typically seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d) that direct marketplaces and payment processors to restrain the listed defendants' accounts; 4 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 341 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 81% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Before you list

Selling anything that might resemble their marks?

Check your design against Duke University's registered marks — and 13M+ others — before you list.

Check your design free

Free trial · no card · 3 checks that never expire

Federal court filings

2
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
3
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
1
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

Schedule-A cases list defendants under a sealed exhibit and commonly seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d). When granted, the court order directs marketplaces (Etsy, Amazon, eBay) and payment processors (PayPal, Stripe) to restrain the listed defendants’ accounts pending the proceeding.

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

335
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
6
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
175
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
42
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
115
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 81% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Designs Duke University has opposed

Real trademark applications Duke University challenged at the USPTO — the kind of design that draws an opposition. If your artwork looks like one of these, expect pushback. Each links to its USPTO docket.

Source: USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board records. “Prevailed” means Duke University got the outcome it sought; settled/withdrawn cases ended without a Board ruling on the merits. Images from public USPTO records.

Marks Duke University has asserted in proceedings

DUKE
DUKE
asserted in 255 proceedings
DUKE
DUKE
asserted in 244 proceedings
DUKE UNIVERSITY
DUKE UNIVERSITY
asserted in 244 proceedings
DUKE UNIVERSITY
DUKE UNIVERSITY
asserted in 242 proceedings
DKE
DKE
asserted in 241 proceedings
DKE
DKE
asserted in 240 proceedings
DKE
DKE
asserted in 239 proceedings
D KE
D KE
asserted in 239 proceedings
MarkSerialProceedings
DUKE78944344255
DUKE78944306244
DUKE UNIVERSITY74208935244
DUKE UNIVERSITY74208934242
DKE74693793241
DKE74694684240
DUKEtext75347293240
DKE75976141239
D KE75976140239
DUKE UNIVERSITY STOREStext74208327232
DUKECARDtext75892149229
DUKE CENTER FOR LIVINGtext75321843229
DUKEtext75567914219
DUKIEtext78674480216
DUKEENGAGEtext77700792208
UNIVERSITAS DUKIANA ERUDITIO ET RELIGIO74208924207
IRON DUKEStext85356737202
DUKE CHILDREN'Stext85658564190
DUKE UNIVERSITY ATHLETICS EXCELLENCE LOYALTY DIVERSITY EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITYSPORTSMANSHIP COMMITMENT INTEGRITY RESPECT D85049335185
DUKE MEDICINEtext78933450184
WASHINGTON DUKE INN & GOLF CLUBtext85756810178
DUKE FORWARDtext85738029171
DUKE CONNECTED CAREtext77771298161
IRON DUKEStext86445421143
D74209062121
D77409399117
D76465255113
(design-only mark)7420906196
(design-only mark)7420906095
DUKE HEALTHtext8691936292
IRON DUKES ID7300213690
DUKEtext8797549881
D U ERUDITIO ET RELIGIO7420905979
DUKE TIPtext8687248478
DUKE TIP8687248877
DUKEtext8753038176
D7420832874
DUKE TIP8693434273
CAMERON CRAZIE D7507894773
D7420906773
D8544776772
D7556506572
DUKES AND DUCHESSEStext8688803470
BLUE DEVILStext7358783460
BLUE DEVILStext7358803759
(design-only mark)7420893743
DEVILS' DUPLICATEStext7505796039
DEVILNETtext7589214839
DUKE7420833034
BLUE DEVIL NETWORKtext8594562531
DUKEtext8726512227
BLUE DEVILStext8672956524
BLUE DEVILtext8672956123
DUKE TRUEtext8812547319
DUKE ROBOTICStext8812546516
(design-only mark)8689123715
JB DUKE HOTELtext883485179
THE LODGE AT DUKE MEDICAL CENTERtext886107479
(design-only mark)742089367
THE BROTHERHOOD D906612035

From public USPTO records. A mark is listed when it appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file. Serial links open the USPTO TSDR record.

Selling a design that may resemble Duke University’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Duke University’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Duke University. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.