⚖️ Files federal trademark or copyright suits

Directed Electronics, Inc.

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 1990–2006

Directed Electronics, Inc. has filed federal trademark or copyright enforcement actions. On record (1990–2006): 36 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 109 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 60% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Before you list

Selling anything that might resemble their marks?

Check your design against Directed Electronics, Inc.'s registered marks — and 13M+ others — before you list.

Check your design free

Free trial · no card · 3 checks that never expire

Federal court filings

0
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
35
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
1
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

99
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
10
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
44
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
29
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
36
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 60% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Designs Directed Electronics, Inc. has opposed

Real trademark applications Directed Electronics, Inc. challenged at the USPTO — the kind of design that draws an opposition. If your artwork looks like one of these, expect pushback. Each links to its USPTO docket.

Source: USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board records. “Prevailed” means Directed Electronics, Inc. got the outcome it sought; settled/withdrawn cases ended without a Board ruling on the merits. Images from public USPTO records.

Marks Directed Electronics, Inc. has asserted in proceedings

XTREME
XTREME
asserted in 5 proceedings
SIDEWINDER
SIDEWINDER
asserted in 3 proceedings
trademark
asserted in 2 proceedings
HORNET
HORNET
asserted in 2 proceedings
TEAM MAYHEM
TEAM MAYHEM
asserted in 1 proceedings
"STINGER"
"STINGER"
asserted in 1 proceedings
BLACK TALON
BLACK TALON
asserted in 1 proceedings
DEI
DEI
asserted in 1 proceedings
MarkSerialProceedings
VIPERtext7377561180
VIPERtext7429331847
VIPERtext7463391146
VIPERtext7469007043
PYTHONtext743641906
XTREME744326205
SIDEWINDER741234533
PYTHONtext753366172
MATRIXtext780567972
(design-only mark)745778762
HORNET741234572
SIDEWINDERStext740210181
SILENT MODEtext745132361
TEAM MAYHEM784825011
PYTHONtext753767821
VIPERtext746329291
"STINGER"741234421
BLACK TALON742879181
NITE-LITEtext745132301
STINGERtext745132381
HORNETtext745787651
DEI743487521
(design-only mark)text138215201
MILKAUTtext742487901

From public USPTO records. A mark is listed when it appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file. Serial links open the USPTO TSDR record.

Selling a design that may resemble Directed Electronics, Inc.’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Directed Electronics, Inc.’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Directed Electronics, Inc.. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.