🏛 Files TTAB oppositions or cancellation petitions

Danjaq, LLC

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 1990–2025

Danjaq, LLC has filed enforcement proceedings at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. On record (1990–2025): 6 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 86 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 93% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Federal court filings

0
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
0
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
6
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

77
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
9
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
63
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
5
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
18
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 93% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Marks Danjaq, LLC has asserted in proceedings

JAMES BOND 007
JAMES BOND 007
asserted in 49 proceedings
007
007
asserted in 45 proceedings
007
007
asserted in 17 proceedings
007
007
asserted in 12 proceedings
YOUNG BOND
YOUNG BOND
asserted in 4 proceedings

Mark images shown from public USPTO records. Listing here reflects that the mark appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file.

Selling a design that may resemble Danjaq, LLC’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Danjaq, LLC’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Danjaq, LLC. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.