📋 Files Schedule-A mass-defendant suits

CreeLED, Inc.

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 2022–2025

Yes. CreeLED, Inc. has filed federal trademark enforcement actions naming online sellers as defendants. On record (2022–2025): 14 federal "Schedule A" trademark infringement (and frequently counterfeiting) lawsuits in which online sellers are named under a sealed defendant exhibit — these proceedings, predominantly filed in the Northern District of Illinois, typically seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d) that direct marketplaces and payment processors to restrain the listed defendants' accounts; 16 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 4 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Before you list

Selling anything that might resemble their marks?

Check your design against CreeLED, Inc.'s registered marks — and 14M+ others — before you list.

Check your design free

Free preview · no signup, no card · full check $8.99

Federal court filings

14
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
16
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
0
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

Schedule-A cases list defendants under a sealed exhibit and commonly seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d). When granted, the court order directs marketplaces (Etsy, Amazon, eBay) and payment processors (PayPal, Stripe) to restrain the listed defendants’ accounts pending the proceeding.

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

4
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
0
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064

Counts reflect proceedings filed, not how they ended. Many TTAB proceedings end without a Board ruling on the merits, for example when the applicant does not respond or a party withdraws. Each proceeding’s outcome is on its public USPTO docket.

Designs CreeLED, Inc. has opposed

Real trademark applications CreeLED, Inc. challenged at the USPTO — the kind of design that draws an opposition. If your artwork looks like one of these, expect pushback. Each links to its USPTO docket.

Source: USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board records. Open a docket to see how that proceeding ended. Images from public USPTO records.

Marks CreeLED, Inc. has asserted in proceedings

CREE
CREE
asserted in 6 proceedings
CREE
CREE
asserted in 5 proceedings
CREE LEDS
CREE LEDS
asserted in 3 proceedings
CREE LED LIGHT
CREE LED LIGHT
asserted in 3 proceedings
CREE
CREE
asserted in 3 proceedings
CREE LED
CREE LED
asserted in 3 proceedings
CREE LED
CREE LED
asserted in 3 proceedings
CREE TRUEWHITE TECHNOLOGY
CREE TRUEWHITE TECHNOLOGY
asserted in 2 proceedings
MarkSerialProceedings
CREEtext758615688
CREEtext779340028
CREEtext779340156
CREE779340186
CREE782605825
CREEtext862285465
CREEtext862285615
CREEtext863501435
CREE LED LIGHTINGtext776360154
CREE LEDS770812543
CREEtext779340103
CREE LED LIGHT788118923
CREEtext862719633
CREEtext863501463
CREE869539333
CREE EDGEtext881709803
CREE LIGHTINGtext883077303
CREE LIGHTINGtext883077353
CREE LEDtext904927203
CREE LED904927243
CREE LED904927273
CREE TRUEWHITE TECHNOLOGY777156672
CREE TRUEWHITEtext779236912
CREE TRUEWHITEtext779237002
XLAMPtext783134882
CREE TRUEWHITE TECHNOLOGY857799902
CREE VENTURE LED COMPANY875419762
CREE VENTURE LED COMPANY875419822
CREE LIGHTING883938942
CREE LIGHTING883939002
CREE LIGHTING883939032
XM-Ltext872188901

From public USPTO records. A mark is listed when it appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file. Serial links open the USPTO TSDR record.

Selling a design that may resemble CreeLED, Inc.’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against CreeLED, Inc.’s registered marks — and 14M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by CreeLED, Inc.. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.