📋 Files Schedule-A mass-defendant suits

Converse Inc.

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 1004–2026

Yes. Converse Inc. has filed federal trademark enforcement actions naming online sellers as defendants. On record (1004–2026): 16 federal "Schedule A" trademark infringement (and frequently counterfeiting) lawsuits in which online sellers are named under a sealed defendant exhibit — these proceedings, predominantly filed in the Northern District of Illinois, typically seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d) that direct marketplaces and payment processors to restrain the listed defendants' accounts; 51 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 331 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 65% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Federal court filings

16
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
51
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
0
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

Schedule-A cases list defendants under a sealed exhibit and commonly seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d). When granted, the court order directs marketplaces (Etsy, Amazon, eBay) and payment processors (PayPal, Stripe) to restrain the listed defendants’ accounts pending the proceeding.

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

321
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
10
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
160
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
86
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
80
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 65% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Marks Converse Inc. has asserted in proceedings

trademark
asserted in 98 proceedings
trademark
asserted in 69 proceedings
CONVERSE ALL STAR CHUCK TAYLOR
CONVERSE ALL STAR CHUCK TAYLOR
asserted in 66 proceedings
CONVERSE ALL STAR
CONVERSE ALL STAR
asserted in 61 proceedings
CONVERSE ALL STAR CHUCK TAYLOR
CONVERSE ALL STAR CHUCK TAYLOR
asserted in 59 proceedings
CONVERSE ALL STAR
CONVERSE ALL STAR
asserted in 56 proceedings
CONVERSE ALL STAR CHUCK TAYLOR
CONVERSE ALL STAR CHUCK TAYLOR
asserted in 56 proceedings
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
asserted in 54 proceedings

Mark images shown from public USPTO records. Listing here reflects that the mark appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file.

Selling a design that may resemble Converse Inc.’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Converse Inc.’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Converse Inc.. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.