⚖️ Files federal trademark or copyright suits

Castrol Limited

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 1982–2026

Castrol Limited has filed federal trademark or copyright enforcement actions. On record (1982–2026): 3 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 43 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 75% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Before you list

Selling anything that might resemble their marks?

Check your design against Castrol Limited's registered marks — and 13M+ others — before you list.

Check your design free

Free trial · no card · 3 checks that never expire

Federal court filings

0
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
3
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
0
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

34
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
9
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
24
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
8
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
11
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 75% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Designs Castrol Limited has opposed

Real trademark applications Castrol Limited challenged at the USPTO — the kind of design that draws an opposition. If your artwork looks like one of these, expect pushback. Each links to its USPTO docket.

Source: USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board records. “Prevailed” means Castrol Limited got the outcome it sought; settled/withdrawn cases ended without a Board ruling on the merits. Images from public USPTO records.

Marks Castrol Limited has asserted in proceedings

CASTROL
CASTROL
asserted in 2 proceedings
CASTROL
CASTROL
asserted in 2 proceedings
CASTROL TECHNICLEAN
CASTROL TECHNICLEAN
asserted in 1 proceedings
CASTROL METACLEAN
CASTROL METACLEAN
asserted in 1 proceedings
CASTROL+PLUS
CASTROL+PLUS
asserted in 1 proceedings
CASTROL
CASTROL
asserted in 1 proceedings
CASTROL
CASTROL
asserted in 1 proceedings
trademark
asserted in 1 proceedings
MarkSerialProceedings
TRIBOLtext731255655
ILOCUTtext740950545
CASTROLtext710613093
MAGNAtext741054282
CASTROLtext733542862
GTXtext743193142
ACCUVISIONtext756122192
CASTROL793731242
TRANSMAXtext734973142
SYNTEC POWER SYSTEMtext755624702
CASTROL871818652
CASTROLtext733543802
CASTROLtext857548462
SYNTRANStext742466312
CASTROLtext733458862
SYNTEKtext734873862
CASTROLtext779201102
SYNTECtext741553382
CASTROLtext757668582
CASTROL TECHNICLEAN742212701
CASTROLtext784516681
CASTROLtext980963831
CASTROL METACLEAN742212791
GTXtext743387441
CASTROL+PLUS745052601
CASTROL731338091
CASTROL744232611
(design-only mark)742540521
ALPHAtext733340581
CASTROL FLEXICLEAN742212781
ASTROL716484041
SYNTEKtext744819731
SEAMAXtext740247251
SYNTECtext744956841
ILOFORMtext740950401

From public USPTO records. A mark is listed when it appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file. Serial links open the USPTO TSDR record.

Selling a design that may resemble Castrol Limited’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Castrol Limited’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Castrol Limited. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.