📋 Files Schedule-A mass-defendant suits

Birkenstock US Bidco, Inc.

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 2021–2026

Yes. Birkenstock US Bidco, Inc. has filed federal trademark enforcement actions naming online sellers as defendants. On record (2021–2026): 5 federal "Schedule A" trademark infringement (and frequently counterfeiting) lawsuits in which online sellers are named under a sealed defendant exhibit — these proceedings, predominantly filed in the Northern District of Illinois, typically seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d) that direct marketplaces and payment processors to restrain the listed defendants' accounts; 5 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 13 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 92% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Before you list

Selling anything that might resemble their marks?

Check your design against Birkenstock US Bidco, Inc.'s registered marks — and 13M+ others — before you list.

Check your design free

Free trial · no card · 3 checks that never expire

Federal court filings

5
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
5
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
0
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

Schedule-A cases list defendants under a sealed exhibit and commonly seek ex parte temporary restraining orders under 15 U.S.C. §1116(d). When granted, the court order directs marketplaces (Etsy, Amazon, eBay) and payment processors (PayPal, Stripe) to restrain the listed defendants’ accounts pending the proceeding.

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

13
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
0
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
11
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
1
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
1
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 92% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Designs Birkenstock US Bidco, Inc. has opposed

Real trademark applications Birkenstock US Bidco, Inc. challenged at the USPTO — the kind of design that draws an opposition. If your artwork looks like one of these, expect pushback. Each links to its USPTO docket.

Source: USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board records. “Prevailed” means Birkenstock US Bidco, Inc. got the outcome it sought; settled/withdrawn cases ended without a Board ruling on the merits. Images from public USPTO records.

Marks Birkenstock US Bidco, Inc. has asserted in proceedings

BIRKENSTOCK BAD HONNEF RHEIN
BIRKENSTOCK BAD HONNEF RHEIN
asserted in 4 proceedings
BIRKO-FLOR
BIRKO-FLOR
asserted in 2 proceedings
BIRKENSTOCK TRADITION SINCE 1774
BIRKENSTOCK TRADITION SINCE 1774
asserted in 1 proceedings
BIRKO
BIRKO
asserted in 1 proceedings
BIRK
BIRK
asserted in 1 proceedings
BIRKENSTOCK TRADITION SINCE 1774
BIRKENSTOCK TRADITION SINCE 1774
asserted in 1 proceedings
MarkSerialProceedings
BIRKENSTOCKtext791642457
BIRKENSTOCKtext730332776
BIRKENSTOCKtext766031386
BIRKENSTOCK BAD HONNEF RHEIN730332754
BIRKO-FLOR762440442
BIRKO-FLORtext790856572
BOSTONtext887269612
PAPILLIOtext782951712
ARIZONAtext887269442
BIRKENSTOCK TRADITION SINCE 1774791715911
BIRKO790962031
MAYARItext792864461
BIRKIBUCtext792881961
BIRKOtext792973931
BIRK759237641
BIRKENSTOCK TRADITION SINCE 1774792313261

From public USPTO records. A mark is listed when it appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file. Serial links open the USPTO TSDR record.

Selling a design that may resemble Birkenstock US Bidco, Inc.’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Birkenstock US Bidco, Inc.’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Birkenstock US Bidco, Inc.. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.