⚖️ Files federal trademark or copyright suits

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Trademark enforcement profile · on record 1975–2026

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated has filed federal trademark or copyright enforcement actions. On record (1975–2026): 8 federal trademark or copyright lawsuits; 73 oppositions and cancellation petitions at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (prevailed in 65% of merits decisions).

Data summary based on public records (USPTO TTAB proceedings and PACER/CourtListener federal court dockets). Figures reflect filings on record, not a characterization of the merits or good faith of any individual action. Not legal advice.

Federal court filings

0
Schedule-A cases
naming online sellers as defendants
8
Federal trademark cases
nature-of-suit 840
0
Federal copyright cases
nature-of-suit 820

At the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

64
Oppositions
under 15 U.S.C. §1063
9
Cancellation petitions
under 15 U.S.C. §1064
37
Prevailed
on the merits, by default, or by abandonment
20
Did not prevail
adverse ruling on the merits
14
Settled / withdrawn
ended without a Board ruling on the merits

Prevailed in 65% of proceedings the Board actually decided on the merits (settled and withdrawn proceedings excluded from this calculation).

Marks Bausch & Lomb Incorporated has asserted in proceedings

RAY.BAN
RAY.BAN
asserted in 13 proceedings
RAY-BAN
RAY-BAN
asserted in 7 proceedings
STORZ
STORZ
asserted in 4 proceedings
LUMIFY
LUMIFY
asserted in 2 proceedings
LUMIFY
LUMIFY
asserted in 2 proceedings
BAUSCH + LOMB LUMIFY
BAUSCH + LOMB LUMIFY
asserted in 2 proceedings
LUMIFY
LUMIFY
asserted in 2 proceedings

Mark images shown from public USPTO records. Listing here reflects that the mark appears as a senior asserted mark in TTAB or federal-court proceedings on file.

Selling a design that may resemble Bausch & Lomb Incorporated’s registered marks?

Run a visual similarity check against Bausch & Lomb Incorporated’s registered marks — and 13M+ other USPTO trademark images — before you list. Takes about 10 seconds.

Run a free visual check

FAQ

Data sources: publicly published USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (1951–2026, with possible gaps before electronic filing) and U.S. federal court dockets (PACER/CourtListener, nature-of-suit codes 840 and 820). Figures reflect filings on record and do not characterize the merits, validity, or legitimacy of any individual action by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated. Trademark holders have legal rights — and in some doctrines, an obligation — to enforce registered marks. This page does not provide legal advice; consult licensed counsel for case-specific questions. See the full leaderboard.